On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 01:29:35PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What you are missing is the history.  All of the problems that we are
> trying to solve were solved already in the original code.  These problem
> are solved most easily by using two mutexes, one for keeping only one
> process in the inner loop, and the inner one for the threads in the
> process.  Then, when you are killing a process, you can easily wake up all
> the threads in the process that are sitting on a lock.

Ah.  Yes, that makes more sense.  But, that's not what's there now.

Shall I submit a patch to threaded MPM to do this?  -- justin

Reply via email to