Re: seg fault in 2.0.23 :-(

[Brian Pane]

Ryan Bloom wrote:

>
>Wild guess here, but look at line 827.  and all the rest of the if statements
>around it.  Shouldn't all of those
>
>((type = exinfo->forced_type))) 
>
>be 
>
>((type == exinfo->forced_type))) 
>
>I would bet that if they were, we would never hit that apr_pstrcat
>
Using == here would break the code, as it's uninitialized before the
first of these expressions.
--Brian