> On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 08:26:12PM -0400, Bill Stoddard wrote: > > I was just able to recreate this on my Windows machine. Will post an analysys (and perhaps > > a fix) later on. > > I have a potential fix but no ability to recreate the fault. ;-) > Given the butt-ugly nature of the current code, I'll commit what I have and > you can take it from there. > > ....Roy Still broken after your commit. The problem is that we are creating an extension_info out of a subrequest pool and sticking it into a longer lived hash table (allocated out of the request pool I'm guessing). When we pull the extension_info out of the hash table later and try to use it, we seg fault because the storage has been reused for something else. No thoughts on a fix. Bill
- Re: seg fault in 2.0.23 :-( Roy T. Fielding
- Re: seg fault in 2.0.23 :-( Ryan Bloom
- Re: seg fault in 2.0.23 :-( Brian Pane
- Re: seg fault in 2.0.23 :-( Ryan Bloom
- Re: seg fault in 2.0.23 :-( Roy T. Fielding
- Re: seg fault in 2.0.23 :-( William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: seg fault in 2.0.23 :-( Bill Stoddard
- Re: seg fault in 2.0.23 :-( Roy T. Fielding
- Re: seg fault in 2.0.23 :-( Bill Stoddard
- Re: seg fault in 2.0.23 :-( Brian Pane
- Re: seg fault in 2.0.23 :-( Ryan Bloom
- Re: seg fault in 2.0.23 :-( Bill Stoddard
- Re: seg fault in 2.0.23... Ryan Bloom
- [PATCH] for mod_mime seg fault in 2.... Greg Ames
- [PATCH] I prefer this... Re: [P... Bill Stoddard
- Re: [PATCH] I prefer this..... Greg Ames
- Re: [PATCH] I prefer this..... William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [PATCH] I prefer th... Bill Stoddard
- Re: [PATCH] I prefer th... William A. Rowe, Jr.
