On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 03:20:42PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: > > > Wild guess here, but look at line 827. and all the rest of the if statements > around it. Shouldn't all of those > > ((type = exinfo->forced_type))) > > be > > ((type == exinfo->forced_type))) > > I would bet that if they were, we would never hit that apr_pstrcat. Nope, those look legit, although the coding style is poor. This is going to require a complete rewrite. ....Roy
- Re: seg fault in 2.0.23 :-( Roy T. Fielding
- Re: seg fault in 2.0.23 :-( Ryan Bloom
- Re: seg fault in 2.0.23 :-( Brian Pane
- Re: seg fault in 2.0.23 :-( Ryan Bloom
- Re: seg fault in 2.0.23 :-( Roy T. Fielding
- Re: seg fault in 2.0.23 :-( William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: seg fault in 2.0.23 :-( Bill Stoddard
- Re: seg fault in 2.0.23 :-( Roy T. Fielding
- Re: seg fault in 2.0.23 :-( Bill Stoddard
- Re: seg fault in 2.0.23 :-( Brian Pane
- Re: seg fault in 2.0.23 :-( Ryan Bloom
- Re: seg fault in 2.0.23 :-( Bill Stoddard
- Re: seg fault in 2.0.23... Ryan Bloom
- [PATCH] for mod_mime seg fault in 2.... Greg Ames
- [PATCH] I prefer this... Re: [P... Bill Stoddard
