Bill Stoddard wrote:
> 
> I prefer this patch which creates a completely new, fully merged, mime_dir_config on 
>each
> call to merge_mime_dir_configs. It is a bit more expensive but should it still work 
>better
> than the table code (maybe. I'd like to see it profiled :-). And this code is a hell 
>of a
> lot easier to understand :-)

OK, I like simplicity too.  But unfortunately I got:

patching file modules/http/mod_mime.c
Hunk #4 FAILED at 212.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 231.
Hunk #6 FAILED at 245.
Hunk #7 FAILED at 259.
Hunk #9 succeeded at 769 with fuzz 1.
4 out of 9 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
modules/http/mod_mime.c.rej

...when I tried it.  Was this patch against the current HEAD?

Greg

Reply via email to