Re: [PATCH] I prefer this... Re: [PATCH] for mod_mime seg fault in 2.0.23 :-)

[Bill Stoddard]

> -1 (veto) to both suggestions.
>
> This is getting obscene.  We've lost all value of tables, since they can't be 
>memcpy'ed,
> they have to be reconstructed.  This will be much slower than the original array 
>code.
>
> Committers, please review dir_create() and dir_merge() patches more carefully.  There
> is a long tradition of configuration bugs due to these assumptions.  The patches that
> added copy/copy_mappings was an attempt to salvage this.
>
> I'll demonstrate a solution, using pool scopes, that adds safety and speed.  Give me 
>a
day.

What are pool scopes?

Bill