At 07:41 AM 2/1/2003 +0100, you wrote:
Hi.

On Fri 2003-01-31 at 22:11:45 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> It confused me for a long time.
>
> ln -s <destination  file>  < source file >    <enter>

Aehem. Wrong, except you have some weird understanding of source (or
maybe I have - I am not a native speaker ;). Or, well, it is probably
a matter of how one thinksabout it. If you think about the act of
linking the file resp. on what the command act upon, it's like "cp",
<snipped extra stuff>

Regards,

        Benjamin.


PS: IIRC, some Solaris version(s) have it the other way around, which
    didn't make it easier for me to remember.

PPS: Note that in order to create a soft link, the "existing" file
     does not need to exist in real, but usually it does, and it helps
     anyhow, if you think about how you *would* copy that non-existing
     file. ;)

Ya know everytime I tell ppl linux is just as simple as windows I'm going to remember this post! Gah!!!!!!

heh thx I'll try to keep all this crud straight.
-------------
FemmeFatale

Good Decisions You boss Made:
"We'll do as you suggest and go with Linux. I've always liked that
character from Peanuts."

- Source: Dilbert



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to