On Thursday 28 Oct 2004 10:09, H.J.Bathoorn wrote: > > From what I've seen until now, I'd eliminate "supermount" as the culprit. > I take this a new 10.1 install you're talking about as 10.0 used devfs and > keeps it when you upgrade > Yes, this was a clean 10.1 install. I reported the supermount, because I was half-asleep when I read, and thought that magic-whatever that replaces it was being suspected. I think you were actually talking devfs and udev, in which case I'm running udev, but Kaj has ruled that one out, so ignore my ramblings ;-)
> I haven't got my camera here at this box, but for comparison here's what I > get when attaching my USB stick (which works exactly the same as my > camera): I did check out harddrake, while correctly recognised the camera. I didn't check 'messages', but I will do that later today. I can run the camera on this box first to pick up any log entries that refer to it, then try it on the 10.1 box and compare output. I'll get back to you. Anne -- Registered Linux User No.293302 Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?
____________________________________________________ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com ____________________________________________________
