On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, you wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 08:03:23AM -0400, Charles A Edwards wrote:
> > I do the same. So I have never read a message that Alexander has posted
> > because he always sends them as attachments.
>
> WRONG! I do not send them as attachments! If your MUA displays the
> content of my messages only as attachments, your MUA is simply broken.
> The messages I send out are of type multipart/signed and contain at
> least three parts:
>
> 1) The message headers
> 2) The message body
> 3) The signature of the message
>
> So if all you see are two attachments, you should use a decent MUA.
> mutt displays it correctly, and I just checked xfmail which also
> displays it completely correct. Pronto! and CSC Mail display the
> whole message, ie. the body and the signature, ie. no attachments
>
> My advice: Get a better MUA!
>
> I use Kmail and I get what appear to be attachments so they go straight to
the bin, if you want them to be read ,rather than suggesting that Charles A
Edwards and myself, among others, get a better MUA why don't you just use plain
text ?
