Thanks Alan,
This makes sense to me. I thought it was
such a nuisance to have to scroll to the
bottom of a message (most of which I had
read earlier) just to get to the new post.
I will continue to do this. I will not
change :)
Bambi
Alan Shoemaker wrote:
>
> Fran....arrrrgggghhh! Don't change. If you reply to the
> previous message in pieces, then yes, each piece belongs below
> the part of the original quoted message that you are
> specifically replying to.
>
> But if you reply in total to the message, by all means save us
> having to scroll through the entire text of the previous
> messge by placing your respopnse at the beginning, followed by
> the quoted message. Sheeesh!!
>
> Alan
>
> Fran Parker wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > Alexander Skwar wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 08:03:23AM -0400, Charles A Edwards wrote:
> > > And while we are at the netiquette: The netiquette also states that
> > > replies should be *BELOW* the text that you quote, and that in a reply
> > > you should only qoute the absolutely neccessary parts of the message,
> > > and not the whole message!
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Alexander Skwar
> > > --
> > > Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com
> > > Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys
> > > ICQ: 7328191
> > >
> > >
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature
> >
> > Gosh, I wondered about that...I always put
> > my comments at the beginning...my thinking
> > was that it makes it easier to view the
> > responses on an existing thread. I didn't
> > realize it should go at the end. Guess I
> > will need to change how I respond.
> >
> > Thanks for the tip.
> >
> > Bambi
