Personally I'd delete the Tiger data if it seems to duplicate better quality user-entered data. I would delete the less accurate duplicate, as it should involve less work. What's the point in duplicating work that's already been done? There's nothing to say that we need to keep every Tiger way that's been imported is there? Or am I missing something?
You might want to check that there aren't any tags applied to the Tiger ways that should be added to the user-entered ways, though, that you know are correct. Regards, Dave --- On Thu, 11/9/08, Eric Ladner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Eric Ladner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [OSM-newbies] US TIGER vs. user-entered data > To: [email protected] > Date: Thursday, 11 September, 2008, 8:25 PM > Generally, I correct the tiger ones. > > once you move something around, be sure to remove the > "tiger:reviewed = no" > tag from the way. > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 2:08 PM, David Carmean > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > Brand new to OSM. I notice that in my neighborhood > there are some roads > > imported from > > TIGER that are pretty far off, and also user-entered > versions of these > > roads. Would it > > be better to correct the TIGER roads and remove the > user-entered versions, > > to keep the additional > > tiger metadata? > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > newbies mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies > > > > > > -- > Eric Ladner > _______________________________________________ > newbies mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
