Mike Sherman wrote: > I have been correcting the TIGER data by moving the ways to line up > with the areal photo imagery. It seems to agree quite well with > the GPS traces. > > I have NOT been removing the "tiger:reviewed = no" tag unless I also > have a GPS trace to confirm the edited data. Should I be removing it?
I'd consider it to be reviewed for accuracy, and that the reviewed=no should be removed, as long as you're sure that the roads you're marking from aerial photos are accurate in alignment and current for your area. Also, you might want to leave it marked as unreviewed if you're not sure of the name or the classification (highway=*) of the road. HTH -Alex Mauer "hawke" _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
