"Eric Ladner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Generally, I correct the tiger ones. > >once you move something around, be sure to remove the "tiger:reviewed = no" >tag from the way.
I'm working on Lake County, Ohio and most of the TIGER data looks like maps drawn by a child with a crayon. I have been correcting the TIGER data by moving the ways to line up with the areal photo imagery. It seems to agree quite well with the GPS traces. I have NOT been removing the "tiger:reviewed = no" tag unless I also have a GPS trace to confirm the edited data. Should I be removing it? Thanks, -Mike >On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 2:08 PM, David Carmean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Brand new to OSM. I notice that in my neighborhood there are some roads >> imported from >> TIGER that are pretty far off, and also user-entered versions of these >> roads. Would it >> be better to correct the TIGER roads and remove the user-entered versions, >> to keep the additional >> tiger metadata? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mike Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
