H.S.Rai wrote: > To make one's data of good quality, do check data for routing from > website http://www.yournavigation.org/
This raises an embarrassingly simple question: if two ways share a node, does that imply that one can travel from one to the other? Example: a minor road crosses a major road on a bridge. I normally have a shared node in the centre of the bridge. With the layers set properly. But trying your router at www.yournavigation.org, it produces an impossible route "jumping off the bridge". I was led into the habit of including a common node by the josm validator which used to object to "ways crossing": that is without the shared node. I have just done a quick search on the wiki to see whether the semantics is specified there, but couldn't find anything. My suspicion is that a shared node implies navigability, but it does not seem to be stated clearly. And the the josm validator is at best misleading? Or is the router wrong? ael _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
