Claudius Henrichs wrote: > And i think the validator is right there: If two ways are sharing a node > thant these elements have a usable connection. Tunnels + Bridges and > their crossing/undergoing ways should therefore not be connected at all. > The router doesn't go wrong in your example, the data isn't in a format > the router is expecting it.
I think that you must have missed the start of this thread: we have already covered that. > I haven't seen a "crossing ways" error from the JOSM validator includign > a boundary for more than 5 months now. If you update JOSM don't forget > to enter the JOSM settings -> "Plugins"-Tab and hit update there to get > your plugins updated as well. If you problem persists... Did you report > it in the bugtracker already? Indeed, I am pretty sure the boundary-highway crossing incident was a long time ago, when I started and assumed that my intuition was wrong and the validator knew what it was about :-) I didn't bugtrack it because I didn't have the time to investigate properly and produce a report that would be of real use to the developers. ael _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
