On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 15:25 +0100, Dave F. wrote: > Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 11:30 +0100, Dave F. wrote: > > > > > > > Imagine a map with just the cycleways (a VERY bare map) as some people > > > seem to want. Imagine trying to follow a cycle route through a big city > > > using just that information. Any cyclist would be lost within 5 minutes! > > > > > > > That argument wrongfully assumes all cities suck at providing adequate > > routes for all commuters, which is demonstratably incorrect for much of > > the pacific northwest and europe. > > > > > I'm a bit bemused by your reply which seems irrelevant: > You weren't talking about all commuters, just cyclists. It's you who > wants all roads other than those for cyclists removed. > Therefore my previous comments.
No, I was including bicycles as a viable mode of transport while suggesting cyclists need an equally specialized map to what motorists have. You think motor vehicle maps show ways not open to motorists typically?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
