On 09/11/2009 06:46 AM, Dave Stubbs wrote: > You can see how this blows up out of any maintainability quite > quickly,
Definitely. But still, even a generic *something* for path (to be then highlighted with the blue border (from cycleway=*?) would be nicer than showing nothing at all. > especially with the proliferation of 'yes' values since the > original highway=path proposal (I think, I wasn't following too > closely). Not sure if you’re writing about the many access-variant keys or the several access values that are similar in meaning to “yes”. If the former, I’d think you only need to care about bicycle for the cycle map, would you not? It’s certainly much worse if you want to highlight designations for several modes of transportation...even 2 gets unwieldy. As for the values, for a cycle-map I’d be inclined to not even highlight anything which has only bicycle=yes, because it would quickly overwhelm everything else – perhaps it’s different where you are, but around here all roads except motorways (and possibly a few others, specially signed) allow bicycles and would thus be bicycle=yes (or would be, if I would be bothered to fully tag every road like that). Beyond that there should be only bicycle=designated. There is also bicycle=official, but perhaps that can be preprocessed into access=no + bicycle=designated before rendering begins? The meanings are the same... -Alex Mauer “hawke”
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
