At 2009-11-18 03:26, you wrote: > >>I have a number of apartment complexes to map... > > > > When I started mapping, I asked a similar question. Based on the responses > > I got and other features, I use a site relation. Example: > > http://osm.org/go/TaBoJz7Oq- > > Great example. I have a question that the wiki doesn't clarify: >http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Site . I believe it >would be best to have the relation site members as inside a polygon (or >multipolygon relation), and that would enclose all site-related members.
They are - see the closed way tagged landuse=residential, which is in the relation as role=boundary. >That way as new features are mapped inside the polygon, there is no need to >remember to add them to the relation. This is something that would have to be done as a new feature in the editors - warn the user that they've added a feature within a closed way that is in a relation as role=boundary, which relation should ordinarily include all things within its boundary (like site and campus), and ask if they want to add the new feature to the relation. -- Alan Mintz <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
