Alan Mintz wrote: >At 2009-11-18 03:26, you wrote: >>>>I have a number of apartment complexes to map... >>> >>>When I started mapping, I asked a similar question. Based on the >>>responses >>>I got and other features, I use a site relation. Example: >>>http://osm.org/go/TaBoJz7Oq- >> >> Great example. I have a question that the wiki doesn't clarify: >>http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Site . I believe >>it >>would be best to have the relation site members as inside a polygon (or >>multipolygon relation), and that would enclose all site-related members. > >They are - see the closed way tagged landuse=residential, which is in the >relation as role=boundary. > > >>That way as new features are mapped inside the polygon, there is no need >>to >>remember to add them to the relation. > >This is something that would have to be done as a new feature in the >editors - warn the user that they've added a feature within a closed way >that is in a relation as role=boundary, which relation should ordinarily >include all things within its boundary (like site and campus), and ask if >they want to add the new feature to the relation.
Been out of town a few days. Thanks. That was helpful information. -- Randy _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
