Sorry, I pasted the wrong link into multimap link showing the OS map for comparison. It should be http://www.multimap.com/s/B1w5Lr07
Jason 2010/1/27 Jason Cunningham <[email protected]> > > 2010/1/27 Someoneelse <[email protected]> > > >> Personally I think that the levels at which Mapnik shows e.g. hedges is >> actually about right, and if the LOOP PDF maps had hedgerows on them at >> their current scale, they'd look a mess. >> > > I think hedges(barriers) would work at the next zoom level up in mapnik. > They dont appear to cause clutter on (roughly) the same zoom with the OS > maps on Multipmap. > Chigwell area in mapnik > [link<http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.6219985485077&lon=0.101816654205322&zoom=15> > ] > Chigwell area in multimap(OS) [link <http://www.multimap.com/s/NgF8hPej>], > contour lines make it a mess though > > The only way to see if it is acceptable is to try it, which I guess is best > done something like Kosmos (think thats the right software). Dont have time > to experiment for several days. Any computer literate person want to try? > > >> (there's actually been a lot more detail added to OSM since the LOOP PDF >> maps were created, by the looks of it) >> > > Agreed, but thats the beauty of OpenStreetMap. I've made several > improvements to land around the London Loop in Bromley that went into the > map just after Walk London created their maps. The maps can only get better. > > Cheer > Jason >
_______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
