> Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 21:02:13 -0700 > From: Isaac Wingfield <[email protected]> > Subject: [OSM-newbies] Rendered two ways; why? > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes > > Here: http://osm.org/go/TZJ35LCvY- are two bounded areas tagged "place > of worship", one above (Oak Grove ...), and one below ( the Church > of ...), the center. > > In Mapnik, the lower one is shaded dark gray while the upper one has > no visible boundary (but you can see it in Edit mode). I added the > area and tag to the upper one last January; how long does it take to > get the area properly rendered? Or did I somehow do the tag > incorrectly? There are other examples, too, but this one should do to > explain the problem. > > Isaac > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 01:57:57 -0400 > From: Richard Weait <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [OSM-newbies] Rendered two ways; why? > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Isaac Wingfield <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Here: http://osm.org/go/TZJ35LCvY- are two bounded areas tagged >> "place >> of worship", one above (Oak Grove ...), and one below ( the Church >> of ...), the center. >> >> In Mapnik, the lower one is shaded dark gray while the upper one has >> no visible boundary (but you can see it in Edit mode). I added the >> area and tag to the upper one last January; how long does it take to >> get the area properly rendered? Or did I somehow do the tag >> incorrectly? There are other examples, too, but this one should do to >> explain the problem. > > Your tag is incorrect. "place of worship" must be "place_of_worship" > Go ahead and add your underscores and the area should show up in a few > minutes. I left it for you to fix so you can watch it render. ;-)
Thanks. I don't know why I didn't notice that before. But now another question: It appears that quite recently, a considerable part of both of those church properties have been relabeled to "amenity: parking", but I don't see how that can be right. The area is certainly not equivalent to a public parking area (which the blue "P" icon now on them suggests); it's church property and intended only for church use. So why is it proper to label it as "parking"? Isaac _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
