On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Isaac Wingfield <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks. I don't know why I didn't notice that before. > > But now another question: It appears that quite recently, a > considerable part of both of those church properties have been > relabeled to "amenity: parking", but I don't see how that can be > right. The area is certainly not equivalent to a public parking area > (which the blue "P" icon now on them suggests); it's church property > and intended only for church use. So why is it proper to label it as > "parking"?
Are they parking lots? That would be visible from aerial imagery. You might add further to the data by including access rules. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Access amenity=parking access=private _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
