On 6/13/10 2:37 PM, Isaac Wingfield wrote: > But now another question: It appears that quite recently, a > considerable part of both of those church properties have been > relabeled to "amenity: parking", but I don't see how that can be > right. The area is certainly not equivalent to a public parking area > (which the blue "P" icon now on them suggests); it's church property > and intended only for church use. So why is it proper to label it as > "parking"? > for non-public parking, an access tag should be set:
access=private access=destination or some such. mapnik currently renders access=destination with a softer, hazier version of the "P" symbol. i'd probably set access=destination for a church lot. richard _______________________________________________ newbies mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/newbies
