On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 04:02:36PM -0700, Jordan Brown wrote: > I would accept that as an answer for my problem. That'd be nice - no code > changes, just documenting the idiom. Formally it's still take an ARC case > to guarantee that it'd work.
Why? To guarantee that this behavior of rpcgen does not change? It's not already effectively Committed? PSARC's take would be that rpcgen is Committed.
