Goodness gracious, I hate top-posting!  Merged with original.

On 10/4/15 10:37 AM, Matt Benjamin wrote:
>> >From: "William Allen Simpson"<william.allen.simp...@gmail.com>
>> >To: "Matt W. Benjamin"<m...@cohortfs.com>
>> >Cc:nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> >Sent: Sunday, October 4, 2015 7:37:52 AM
>> >Subject: Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] WARNING to all ntirpc developers
>> >
>> >Dan's cmake completely overwrites src/libntirpc*IN PLACE*  the
>> >next time you make ganesha.
>> >
>> >If you have any changes pending, save/push your commits
>> >somewhere before your next compile after updating.
>> >
> Well, something broke.  The defined model for fetching the ntirpc src did not 
> depend on the default branch of the upstream repository, nor on its top 
> commit, we made the commit explicit.  I tend to think that's preferable to 
> freezing a branch.
>
That was the submodule version.  Now gone.

We will be dependent on freezing a branch.


>> >On 10/3/15 8:32 AM, Matt W. Benjamin wrote:
>>> > >----- "William Allen Simpson"<william.allen.simp...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> >I've been treating it as the official ntirpc development site.
>> >
>> >Should it be abandoned, then?
>> >
> There hasn't been official use of linuxbox2/ntirpc.git by nfs-ganesha 
> checkouts for, iirc, 3 years.

nfs-ganesha checkouts of linuxbox2/ntirpc.git were not
mentioned in my message(s).


> I agree it's duplex-12 branch should, if it is updated, only contain commits 
> seen on upstream duplex-12.  But please do not assume we are keeping it up to 
> date--because no one expected to be relying on it.  This is you inventing a 
> rule, and complaining about me breaking it.
>
In the past, things were always pushed to linuxbox2/ntirpc before
they were pushed by you to nfs-ganesha/ntirpc.  That was your rule,
communicated to me for my work.

All development branches were off of the linuxbox2 master, currently
designated "duplex-12".  Based upon your response, I'll stop using
linuxbox2/ntirpc.

What gerrit branch is being used to push proposed ntirpc changes?


> Please tone down the rhetoric a bit.  These are changes on a
> development branch. [...]
>
These are changes on the -rc branch.  We agreed on the phone
call (that you missed) to warn everybody that their submodule
would be overwritten.  It's kinda important! :)


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list
Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel

Reply via email to