Ok. *internal* as PersistentBag is (for example). On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 5:38 AM, Frédéric Delaporte <x...@free.fr <fredericdelapo...@free.fr>> wrote:
> I do not care about keeping Iesi or not, I just care on keeping the > feature working in a satisfactory way. > So with those conditions, it should be alright. > > NHibernate already have some own internal specialized > collection/dictionary for its internal uses. Why not adding another one. > But it should be internal, since this is not the purpose of NHibernate to > supply specialized collections to consume. > Then if the user needs to instantiate some ordering preserving hashset on > his side, it will be up to him to use some adequate implementation, be it > Iesi or something else. > > Le dimanche 19 novembre 2017 00:24:29 UTC+1, Fabio Maulo a écrit : >> >> Sir, yes sir. >> >> Can we agree about this: >> . The PR should allow the usage of order-by in <set> mapping >> . As all other *persistent collection* NH may have its own >> implementation to ensure the behavior just when the collection comes from NH >> . The user is responsible to use an ISet implementation that >> maintains the order when he works on its side >> . The PR should pass at least all existing tests >> >> Is it ok ? >> >> -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "nhibernate-development" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to nhibernate-development+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Fabio Maulo *T* @fabiomaulo *S fabiomaulo* -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nhibernate-development" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to nhibernate-development+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
