something like .SetProjection(Projections.Count(..)).UniqueResult<int>()?


2010/1/4 Paul Batum <[email protected]>

> I tried using QueryOver as a temporary compromise but I couldn't find
> a way to get the count(), which makes it useless for paged search
> results. Did I miss that somehow?


> And still, I would like to know more about what the plans are for
> eager fetching with the new linq provider.
>
>
>
> On Jan 4, 11:37 pm, Mohamed Meligy <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Yes, Fabio. The last part is not technically correct. I should have said
> "it
> > comes with the new Linq provider" meaning "with" as "they were found
> > together in the same time almost" not "as part of".
> >
> > The explanation as I mentioned before this:
> > "is a new API that tries to sit in the middle between the old criterion
> API
> > and the shiny LINQ".
> >
> > Great AP BTW.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Mohamed Meligy
> > Senior Developer, Team Lead Backup (.Net Technologies - TDG -
> Applications)
> > Injazat Data Systems
> > P.O. Box: 8230 Abu Dhabi, UAE.
> >
> > Phone:  +971 2 6992700
> > Direct:   +971 2 4045385
> > Mobile:  +971 50 2623624, +971 55 2017 621
> >
> > E-mail: [email protected]
> > Weblog:http://weblogs.asp.net/meligy
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > Mohamed, that is not part of the new Linq provider but is a "new"
> > > implementation of Criteria (it sit on top of Criteria but let you work
> in a
> > > more "natural" way).
> >
> > > 2010/1/4 Mohamed Meligy <[email protected]>
> >
> > > This is unfortunately not in the new IQueryable (the one you can access
> > >> through ISession.Query<>() method).
> >
> > >> However, it is available in a new API that tries to sit in the middle
> > >> between the old criterion API and the shiny LINQ. It comes as part of
> the
> > >> new LINQ provider although it's not LINQ, and tries to simulate LINQ
> syntax.
> > >> Try instead of Query<>() to call the new other method
> > >> ISession.QueryOver<>().
> >
> > >> Sample:
> >
> > >> var query = MySession.QueryOver<ParentEntityType>()
> > >>     .Fetch(x => x.RelatedProperty).Eager
> > >>     .Fetch(x => x.MyOtherProperty).Eager
> > >>     .Where(x => x.Something == someValue)
> > >>     .And(x => x.SomeOthercondition)
> > >>     .OrderBy(orderCriteria).Asc;
> >
> > >> You have nice LINQ-Like methods like Skip() and Take(), as well as a
> > >> List() method for returning multiple results and UniqueResult<>() for
> > >> returning single entity.
> >
> > >> Regards,
> >
> > >> --
> > >> Mohamed Meligy
> > >> Senior Developer, Team Lead Backup (.Net Technologies - TDG -
> > >> Applications)
> > >> Injazat Data Systems
> > >> P.O. Box: 8230 Abu Dhabi, UAE.
> >
> > >> Phone:  +971 2 6992700
> > >> Direct:   +971 2 4045385
> > >> Mobile:  +971 50 2623624, +971 55 2017 621
> >
> > >> E-mail: [email protected]
> > >> Weblog:http://weblogs.asp.net/meligy
> >
> > >> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Paul Batum <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > >>> The old linq provider had an Expand method that allowed you to
> specify
> > >>> eager loading, but I can't find the equivalent on the new provider. I
> > >>> have been able to compensate for this in some cases by specifying a
> > >>> join in the linq expression, but this won't work in all cases, such
> as
> > >>> when you want a collection eagerly loaded. Can someone clarify what
> > >>> the current state of affairs is regarding load options for the new
> > >>> provider and what the plans are?
> >
> > >>> Thanks!
> >
> > >>> Paul Batum
> >
> > >>> --
> >
> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > >>> "nhusers" group.
> > >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >>> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> <nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> >
> > >>> .
> > >>> For more options, visit this group at
> > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
> >
> > >>  --
> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > >> "nhusers" group.
> > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> <nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> >
> > >> .
> > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > >>http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
> >
> > > --
> > > Fabio Maulo
> >
> > >  --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > "nhusers" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> <nhusers%[email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> >
> > > .
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "nhusers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
>
>

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.


Reply via email to