Thanks guys. I'm not hugely familiar with the criteria API so I missed
that one.

I'll try pestering Steve on twitter regarding his plans for eager
fetching with the new provider.

On Jan 5, 10:31 am, "Richard Brown \(gmail\)"
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Also, if you're using the trunk, the syntax for UniqueResult recently 
> changed, so it's now:
>
> session.QueryOver<obj>()
>     ...
>     .Select(Projections.RowCount())
>     .SingleOrDefault<int>();
>
> From: Richard Brown (gmail)
> Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 11:22 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [nhusers] Re: How to specify eager loading with the new hql 
> based linq provider?
>
> That looks right.  There's always a chance something was missed though - let 
> me know if you find something that can be done in ICriteria but not in 
> QueryOver.  (Sorry Paul, I don't know the answer to the eager-Linq question 
> yet though.)
>
> From: José F. Romaniello
> Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 10:13 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [nhusers] Re: How to specify eager loading with the new hql 
> based linq provider?
>
> something like .SetProjection(Projections.Count(..)).UniqueResult<int>()?
>
> 2010/1/4 Paul Batum <[email protected]>
>
>   I tried using QueryOver as a temporary compromise but I couldn't find
>   a way to get the count(), which makes it useless for paged search
>   results. Did I miss that somehow?
>
>   And still, I would like to know more about what the plans are for
>   eager fetching with the new linq provider.
>
>   On Jan 4, 11:37 pm, Mohamed Meligy <[email protected]> wrote:
>   > Yes, Fabio. The last part is not technically correct. I should have said 
> "it
>   > comes with the new Linq provider" meaning "with" as "they were found
>   > together in the same time almost" not "as part of".
>   >
>   > The explanation as I mentioned before this:
>   > "is a new API that tries to sit in the middle between the old criterion 
> API
>   > and the shiny LINQ".
>   >
>   > Great AP BTW.
>   >
>   > Regards,
>   >
>   > --
>   > Mohamed Meligy
>   > Senior Developer, Team Lead Backup (.Net Technologies - TDG - 
> Applications)
>   > Injazat Data Systems
>   > P.O. Box: 8230 Abu Dhabi, UAE.
>   >
>   > Phone:  +971 2 6992700
>   > Direct:   +971 2 4045385
>   > Mobile:  +971 50 2623624, +971 55 2017 621
>   >
>
>   > E-mail: [email protected]
>
>   > Weblog:http://weblogs.asp.net/meligy
>   >
>
>   > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Fabio Maulo <[email protected]> wrote:
>   > > Mohamed, that is not part of the new Linq provider but is a "new"
>   > > implementation of Criteria (it sit on top of Criteria but let you work 
> in a
>   > > more "natural" way).
>   >
>
>   > > 2010/1/4 Mohamed Meligy <[email protected]>
>
>   >
>   > > This is unfortunately not in the new IQueryable (the one you can access
>   > >> through ISession.Query<>() method).
>   >
>   > >> However, it is available in a new API that tries to sit in the middle
>   > >> between the old criterion API and the shiny LINQ. It comes as part of 
> the
>   > >> new LINQ provider although it's not LINQ, and tries to simulate LINQ 
> syntax.
>   > >> Try instead of Query<>() to call the new other method
>   > >> ISession.QueryOver<>().
>   >
>   > >> Sample:
>   >
>   > >> var query = MySession.QueryOver<ParentEntityType>()
>   > >>     .Fetch(x => x.RelatedProperty).Eager
>   > >>     .Fetch(x => x.MyOtherProperty).Eager
>   > >>     .Where(x => x.Something == someValue)
>   > >>     .And(x => x.SomeOthercondition)
>   > >>     .OrderBy(orderCriteria).Asc;
>   >
>   > >> You have nice LINQ-Like methods like Skip() and Take(), as well as a
>   > >> List() method for returning multiple results and UniqueResult<>() for
>   > >> returning single entity.
>   >
>   > >> Regards,
>   >
>   > >> --
>   > >> Mohamed Meligy
>   > >> Senior Developer, Team Lead Backup (.Net Technologies - TDG -
>   > >> Applications)
>   > >> Injazat Data Systems
>   > >> P.O. Box: 8230 Abu Dhabi, UAE.
>   >
>   > >> Phone:  +971 2 6992700
>   > >> Direct:   +971 2 4045385
>   > >> Mobile:  +971 50 2623624, +971 55 2017 621
>   >
>
>   > >> E-mail: [email protected]
>
>   > >> Weblog:http://weblogs.asp.net/meligy
>   >
>
>   > >> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Paul Batum <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>   >
>   > >>> The old linq provider had an Expand method that allowed you to specify
>   > >>> eager loading, but I can't find the equivalent on the new provider. I
>   > >>> have been able to compensate for this in some cases by specifying a
>   > >>> join in the linq expression, but this won't work in all cases, such as
>   > >>> when you want a collection eagerly loaded. Can someone clarify what
>   > >>> the current state of affairs is regarding load options for the new
>   > >>> provider and what the plans are?
>   >
>   > >>> Thanks!
>   >
>   > >>> Paul Batum
>   >
>   > >>> --
>   >
>   > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups
>   > >>> "nhusers" group.
>   > >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>   > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>
>   > >>> 
> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
>
>   > >>> .
>   > >>> For more options, visit this group at
>   > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>   >
>   > >>  --
>   > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups
>   > >> "nhusers" group.
>   > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>   > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>
>   > >> 
> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
>
>   > >> .
>   > >> For more options, visit this group at
>   > >>http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>   >
>   > > --
>   > > Fabio Maulo
>   >
>   > >  --
>   > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups
>   > > "nhusers" group.
>   > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>   > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>
>   > > 
> [email protected]<nhusers%[email protected]>
>
>   > > .
>   > > For more options, visit this group at
>   > >http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
>   --
>
>   You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "nhusers" group.
>   To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>   To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
>   For more options, visit this group 
> athttp://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "nhusers" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group 
> athttp://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"nhusers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en.


Reply via email to