Nim v2: what would you change?

[didlybom]

What if you could define an object inline as follows? :
    
    
    type Foo = object
       f1: int
       f2: type SugarObject = object
          f3: int
       f4: SugarObject
          f5: int
    
    
    Run

I don't know if this is worth the extra language complexity though...