The for loop syntax needs a do over. Currently implicit calls to items and pairs iterators, together with the "new" tuple unpacking syntax, which doesn't actually implicitly call pairs, makes it very confusing for users. Not to mention that the later is riddled with bugs. So I would like something to be done about it. Either remove `for (x, y)` and keep how Nim used to work or the opposite. But please don't keep both for v2.
- Nim v2: what would you change? ynfle
- Nim v2: what would you change? nimoid
- Nim v2: what would you change? xigoi
- Nim v2: what would you change? nimoid
- Nim v2: what would you change? planetis
- Nim v2: what would you change? nimoid
- Nim v2: what would you change? didlybom
- Nim v2: what would you change? nimoid
- Nim v2: what would you change? coffeepot
- Nim v2: what would you change? Zectbumo
- Nim v2: what would you change? planetis
- Nim v2: what would you change? murdohekku
- Nim v2: what would you change? federico3
- Nim v2: what would you change? ggibson
- Nim v2: what would you change? JPLRouge
- Nim v2: what would you change? pdkoekfr
- Nim v2: what would you change? cmc
- Nim v2: what would you change? konsumlamm
- Nim v2: what would you change? avandy
- Nim v2: what would you change? j-james
- Nim v2: what would you change? ingo
