I somewhat agree ofc, though I prefer to think about reality. The reality is the team size of Nim is perfect for creating half baked versions of a ton of features, which graciously allows you yo finish the baking process as you please ;-)
And if you look around this us how most languages end up being born, a companies desire for a specific paradigm(Go, Mojo[O.o]). You can even see how Status has somewhat made Nim its own in many respects, because other languages just werent suited for exactly their opionated constraints. Really Nim is the nicest open compiler in a respectful(sometimes tedious) sense on the market, opinionated but only foundationally so. If Nim were never to receive another compiler version from today, it would still be my preffered choice given the compositionality of new features from whatever silly new language comes out. Success is so overrated, and excellence only exists in relation to whatever specific problem you are solving, and Nim is much more generally excellent, and less specifically so.
