@Araq Sorry if I'm a bit slow on the uptake, but I'm not sure about what you meant. libuv is wrapped in the stdlib, which is great, but if it's really based on a 3+ yo version (is it?), AND libuv is updated regularly, which it is, then I do see the need for a non-stdlib that is more recent. If what you meant is that we should stick to the stdlib wrapper, and it sounds like that to me, then I guess you would like a pull-request instead of a third-party wrapper? And if you meant something else, then you lost me.
- Is anyone using the libuv wrappers? monster
- Re: Is anyone using the libuv wrappers? ervin
- Re: Is anyone using the libuv wrappers? 2vg
- Re: Is anyone using the libuv wrappers? 2vg
- Re: Is anyone using the libuv wrappers? monster
- Re: Is anyone using the libuv wrappers? Araq
- Re: Is anyone using the libuv wrappers... monster
- Re: Is anyone using the libuv wrap... 2vg
- Re: Is anyone using the libuv wrap... yglukhov
- Re: Is anyone using the libuv wrap... monster
- Re: Is anyone using the libuv wrap... mashingan
- Re: Is anyone using the libuv wrap... yglukhov
- Re: Is anyone using the libuv wrap... monster
- Re: Is anyone using the libuv wrap... cheatfate
- Re: Is anyone using the libuv wrap... cheatfate
- Re: Is anyone using the libuv wrap... monster
- Re: Is anyone using the libuv wrap... mashingan
