@yglukhov Maybe, but if I understand asyncdispatch propertly, it's really not comparable to libuv. I haven't checked the implementation of asyncdispatch, but it looks to me as if, under the hood, it's still one-thread-per-blocking-IO-call. So If I was listening to 100 sockets, it would need 100 threads? If that is the case, then asyncdispatch simply isn't an option for me, as it won't _scale_ well.
@2vg Well, if the libuv wrapper was deleted from devel, then Araq couldn't possibly have been implying that SSL support for libuv should belong to stdlib. We'll just have to wait for Araq to reply.
