And now for a slightly longer answer: > 1\. It is not the number of digits after the decimal point, it is the number > of digits. You made the sentence longer, which restrict it truth value to > output in scientific notation.
I didn't change anything there except put the capital letter in the beginning of the sentence. > 2\. fac(), why is argument int, when we have Natural. I've considered it, but I wasn't sure if that would be outside of the scope of **docs** improvement. I'd rather see Natural there too. > With natural the long explanation "of a non-negative integer" would be > obsolete ...but I would still keep it, because that module is used quite a lot and beginners might not be familiar with Natural. You'll notice more of these "not needed" explanations in the frequently used modules, to make them more understandable to beginners. > Is module ONLY available for JavaScript, not for C? People not familiar with > Nim may think so. Once again, this is something I didn't touch, it was written like that from before. But I agree, this should be changed to something like "This module is _also_ available for the JavaScript target."
