All of the logos Tim has proposed look like clear improvements over the current one to me. I think we should just pick one and use it! There's no downside to adopting one of these logos, since they maintain the same basic design as the current one but with cleaner, modernized design.
I think we should avoid bikeshedding and turning this into some massive project. It doesn't need to be perfect, it just needs to be an improvement. It makes sense to pick two logos, one which is print friendly and one which is not. There's no reason to constrain other media to be print friendly, and I think the subtle gradients are a nice touch. On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:07 PM, stewart mackenzie <[email protected]> wrote: > Personally I really like what the current logo communicates to me: > > * lambdas, lots of them > * snowflake - a unique system > > I'm enjoying these logos! > > /sjm > > On 26 Aug 2015 00:16, "Cillian de Róiste" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Before updating the logo, I > > wonder if we should step back a bit and think about what the logo > > should communicate. I added a stub of a page to the wiki to develop a > > style guide, but I haven't done much with it since: > > https://nixos.org/wiki/Style_Guide . Would something like that be a > > good place to start? > > > > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > >
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
