>> Probably so that it can more easily be bundled with a commercial Unix, >> as has happened with other versions of MH in the past. Most companies >> tend to be a bit put off by the GPL. > >They are put off by it if they want to use the source for there own >needs. I take it you have never given the GPL to a lawyer to read? They go apeshit. They _really really_ don't like it. --Ken
- Passing nmh maintenance to someone else Richard Coleman
- Re: Passing nmh maintenance to someone else Scott Blachowicz
- Re: Passing nmh maintenance to someone else Jerry Peek
- Re: Passing nmh maintenance to someone else Richard Coleman
- License (was Re: Passing nmh maintenance to ... Dan Harkless
- Re: License (was Re: Passing nmh mainten... Dom Mitchell
- Re: License (was Re: Passing nmh ma... Earl Hood
- Re: License (was Re: Passing nm... Ken Hornstein
- Re: License (was Re: Passin... Chris Garrigues
- Re: License (was Re: Passin... Ken Hornstein
- Re: License (was Re: Passin... Earl Hood
- Re: License (was Re: Passin... Ken Hornstein
- Re: License (was Re: Passing nm... Simon Burge
- Re: License (was Re: Passin... Scott Blachowicz
- Re: License (was Re: Passin... Dan Harkless
