Shantonu Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> ruserpass(), which is unreliably detected and possibly implemented. I
> >> think the TODO mentions some other functions, like snprintf, which aren't
> >> implemented yet, but it makes sense to have that section in the README.dev
> >> as a placeholder.
> >
> >Yeah, if we _ever_ use the system functions, as we do with snprint(), they
> >shouldn't go in that section.
> >
> >But if we sometimes use the vendor ruserpass(), then our nmh_getpass() won't
> >get called -- we need to always use our ruserpass() or else rename
> >nmh_getpass() back to getpass() (assuming vendor ruserpass() functions
> >always call getpass()).
>
> System ruserpass is never used. I removed the dependency because of this
> kind of complication.
I see -- you were just listing it as an "nmh-local function to use in
preference to OS version". That section only covers functions with
different names than the system ones, however, as when the name is the same,
developers don't need to do anything special -- they just type the normal
system function name.
I see you didn't make a ChangeLog entry for your getpass() and ruserpass()
changes -- please do so...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Harkless | To prevent SPAM contamination, please
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | do not post this private email address
SpeedGate Communications, Inc. | to the USENET or WWW. Thank you.
