Ken Hornstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At this point, I become the Grand High Poobah of nmh.
Great, politics already. :/ > I _would_ like to do off-site backups of the CVS repository, > but assuming everything goes through, I'll work that off-line > with Doug. Definately... It would be a shame to loose all the history. One nice way to accomplish this would be to allow cvsup access, then anyone can have a full mirror of the cvs repository. > At this point, we create a release branch. I don't see a need for a branch at this point. All the work will be moving along the same path and thus can be done on HEAD. > Me, Shantonu, and maybe a few others do whatever release > engineering work we need to do get nmh 2.0 (or whatever we call > it, but I think nmh 2.0 is a good version number). I'm > thinking a couple of beta release cycles and then a new final > release, maybe by the end of January. I am not sure the changes thus far warrant bumping the major version number, but in the scheme of things I don't think it is really worth arguing over so whatever everyone else thinks. Aiming for the end of Janurary sounds reasonable enough to get all the patches tested and commited. -- Doug Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
