> "Chad C. Walstrom" wrote: > >On the topic of version number designation, I personally like the way > >the Linux kernel is versioned. If you're not familiar with it, here's > >the quick and dirty. MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH. MAJOR changes when > > We had this discussion before and opted for labeling in-development > sourcw tiht +dev (hence, I am running version 1.0.4+dev at the > moment). The discussion is in the mailing list archives.
You really need to increment the version number every time there's a commit. That way, when someone says 'nmh-1.04-dev-5 did this' you know precisely where you're up to. Everyone who commits should get a report telling what version they just created. Oh, if you want people to help, be nice. I don't have the full thread yet, but I sense that Laura's not entirely happy. -- Cheers John Summerfield Microsoft's most solid OS: http://www.geocities.com/rcwoolley/ Note: mail delivered to me is deemed to be intended for me, for my disposition.
