"Chad C. Walstrom" wrote:
>On the topic of version number designation, I personally like the way
>the Linux kernel is versioned.  If you're not familiar with it, here's
>the quick and dirty.  MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH.  MAJOR changes when

We had this discussion before and opted for labeling in-development
sourcw tiht +dev (hence, I am running version 1.0.4+dev at the
moment). The discussion is in the mailing list archives.

--
Doug Morris
Morris Communications & Computer Services, Inc.
http://www.mhost.com/

Reply via email to