Doug Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Could everyone please just settle down? You all are so worried >about moving the project to a new location, but there does not >seem to be any immediate need for that. Ftp access and anonymous >CVS access to nmh still work. Take what source exists and >actually work on some patches instead of worrying about your CVS >commit access.
I'm inclined to agree with Doug P. on this. If development of nmh is languishing, it it because nobody is doing much of the work. When Richard Coleman was in charge, things moved along. But since then, nobody has been in charge. A few people have stepped in and managed things for a little while, so that they could make their own changes. Moving the repository won't solve that. If Richard wants to step back into that role, I would be happy to see that. If somebody else is willing to take charge that would be fine too. I suspect that we all use nmh, and for the most part we are happy with it. We have a few gripes about little points. But it works well enough for us, that we don't want to put the effort into continuing Richard's original plans to clean up the code base and make it more maintainable. -NWR
