[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> "Chris Garrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> >What was the date of the memo.  I think we may need to celebrate mh's silver 
> >anniversary.
> >
> ------- Forwarded Message
> 
> Received: from truth.rand.org by rand.org; Tue, 17 Apr 90 09:03:40 -0700
> Received: from localhost by truth.rand.org; Tue, 17 Apr 90 09:03:48 PDT
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robert_Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>         Phyllis_Kantar <phyl@rcc>, Tora_Bikson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>         Willis_Ware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: The memo that began mh
> Cc: Norman_Shapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 90 09:03:47 PDT
> From: norm@truth
> 
> Attached is the result of rekeying a hardcopy of the memorandum.
> An original softcopy is no longer available.
> The rekeying attempted to duplicate the hardcopy including typos.
> The hard copy was not dated, but is was sent sometime prior to February
> 17 1977 and probably sometime after January 17 1977.
> 
> 
> To:       Bob Anderson
> 
> From:     Stock Gaines, Norm Shapiro
> 
> Subject:  THE NEXT MESSAGE SYSTEM
[...]

This is wonderful, Norm!!  Thanks so much for posting this!  I definitely
want to add this to the docs directory once we have the new CVS archive up
and working.

nmh has got to be one of a very tiny number of open source packages whose
codebase has remained active for so many years, so historical documents like
this are very valuable, IMHO.

When Richard started nmh he decided to throw out almost all the historical
info, but I feel this is a mistake.  I've already added back the MH
ChangeLogs, since those were the most important lost files, but I when I get
a chance I want to look through the other informational files in the MH
distribution to check for other stuff worth saving.

--
Dan Harkless    
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://harkless.org/dan/

Reply via email to