Ken Hornstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Yes, without a timezone offset. I have a bunch of these from my company's > >Japanese customer. Also found one in a recent (March 2002) post on the > >Bugtraq mailing list (I can't point you to the online archived copy because > >the archive parses the dates and re-states them relative to one's own > >timezone), and elsewhere. > > Fair enough; I stand corrected (but I think at this stage in the lifetime > of the Internet, they're in the minority).
Naturally. > >Again, I don't understand why you're making such a big deal of this. If I > >find the functionality important and want to spend time implementing it once > >we have a new working CVS repository, more power to me, no? > > I have no objection to you or anyone implementing this functionality > (and I don't believe I ever said so). No, you only implied it. > I am just explaining why I don't > think it's that important in the larger scheme of things. Obviously, > you and I don't agree on this one; that's fine. The original post > which triggered your reply was only me saying that I don't think the > timezone parsing was anything worth holding up the release on. No, it was you saying you thought the problem was all in my head. I've stated multiple times that I agree this isn't worth holding up the 1.0.5 release now that it's lagged for so long. -- Dan Harkless [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://harkless.org/dan/
