>I haven't had time to check, but I suspect -1 is what it's giving. >I disagree with your reading of the standard though: -1 means failure, >and in a failure case there is not any specification about what went >into the buffer.
I agree with that ... but why is it failing? If the only reason it's failing is because the buffer isn't big enough, that is wrong; it's supposed to return the number of bytes it wanted to write. My reading of the code we have now is that it's correctly rejecting the case where snprintf() returns -1. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
