On 6/6/2012 11:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > ... [ some experimenting later ... ] What it appears to be doing is > filling the buffer to the specified length and then returning -1 > anyway. Given your argument that there is no reason for it to fail, I > suppose the quickest hack is to assume that -1 means the same as > "buffer filled". regards, tom lane
or we could just say, link against some library that provides a reasonable snprintf that follows posix? _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
