Ken wrote: > But clearly the "MH way" was to silently discard sequences that > exceeded the per-folder limit. That doesn't mean that it should > always be the way, of course.
It'd be nice if it wasn't that way. And I also think that nmh shouldn't have such a low limit on the number of sequences. Even 59 is, or will soon be, too low for someone. It'd be nice if we wouldn't have to reimplement C++ std::vector to get dynamic sizing. Short of that, I'm with Paul V. on falling back to a bit vector. David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
