ken wrote: > >right now there's no reason to think so. thus my recommendation > >that we follow the earlier advice and make the one-line change. > > M. Levinson sent me private email and pointed out that it's not QUITE > a one-line change; some casts are needed in the sequence macros to > prevent bit-shifts from overflowing an int. He was kind enough to > send me patches that did that, so I'll probably integrate that today > along with Paul's suggestions.
but this will still leave folks that use both new and old versions of MH vulnerable to having sequences dropped when they use the old version, right? i'm not sure what i think we can do about that -- but either a warning (not sure when or where it should happen), or an optional profile entry which restricts the number of sequences to the old limit, for people that have mixed installations. paul > > --Ken > > _______________________________________________ > Nmh-workers mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers ---------------------- paul fox, [email protected] (arlington, ma, where it's 35.8 degrees) _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
