>And I also think that nmh shouldn't have such a low limit on >the number of sequences. Even 59 is, or will soon be, too >low for someone. It'd be nice if we wouldn't have to
Really? This might be a bit of armchqir quarterbacking... but it seems to me if you have 5 dozen sequences in one folder you're doing it wrong e.g; keep hundreds of messages in your inbox and using sequences like gmail labels rather than using folders, or have many temporary things can be handled with refile -link and rmf a la relative numbering. It might offend one's engineer sensibilities that sequences are limited, but on the flip-side there's something to be said for simplicity and the fact that the system works, no? Arbitrary and low limits from older system constraints should be updated of course, but why rejigger everything for a use case that nobody currently has? Nobody can have more than 27 labels, and it does not seem to have been an issue. If the ceiling can be doubled without effort that makes sense though. _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers