+1.
Ralph Corderoy <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hi kre,
>
>> With MH, extracting information from the header, as constructed by
>the
>> user, having a group with no addresses in the user constructed
>message
>> would clearly be a useless form ... since the header field is the
>only
>> place MH has from which to extract destination addresses, if there
>are
>> none present there, the message cannot be sent to anyone.
>
>ISTM that MH's authors took a wrong turn, given their implementation of
>bcc and their reluctance to add dcc. This pushed them towards removing
>the recipients from a group address. Having a "normal" bcc, or dcc
>early on, would have given that second place to put the recipients when
>an empty group is wanted for privacy.
>
>Cheers, Ralph.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Nmh-workers mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
