On Mar 7, 2014, at 5:13 PM, Ken Hornstein <[email protected]> wrote: > Well ... we were all over the place, part of that was the limitations > imposed by CVS branch naming before.
I know. I have dealt with them all over the years :-P (RCS, CVS, svn, git, p4, hg, ...) I just want a bit of consistency. Something that people can look at 20 years down the road and (hopefully) immediately understand.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
